<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>One Shot Design &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1sd.org/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1sd.org</link>
	<description>Areas of our digital life that should be left open or kept closed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:08:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A solution for safely remembering your password</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2010/04/27/a-solution-for-safely-remembering-your-password/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2010/04/27/a-solution-for-safely-remembering-your-password/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PasswordCard is a customizable solution for picking and remembering passwords similar to the charts banks have been using for online banking login. Here is how it works: The Web site uses a reference key to generate a PasswordCard. In this example it is 3139514585bbbd70. You can safely write your key down and store it somewhere. If someone gets hold of it, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2010/04/27/a-solution-for-safely-remembering-your-password/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British anti-leaking guidelines document leaked</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/10/27/british-anti-leaking-guidelines-document-leaked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/10/27/british-anti-leaking-guidelines-document-leaked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data irresponsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following several cases of data irresponsibility, namingly government officials &#8220;losing&#8221; unencrypted classified information, the British Ministry of Defence compiled a document outlining how to prevent confidential information from being leaked to the Internet. Problem is, that very document has just been leaked to the Internet. Bummer!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/10/27/british-anti-leaking-guidelines-document-leaked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>simple reasons as to why Windows Live sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/09/02/two-simple-reasons-for-why-windows-live-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/09/02/two-simple-reasons-for-why-windows-live-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloatware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercriminality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data irresponsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve started using my Microsoft Hotmail Windows Live account again, and it didn&#8217;t take a hard look to find 2 reasons why it is vastly inferior to Google Mail: Informations are passed on a transparent HTTP connection. Gmail uses encrypted HTTPS all session long. Windows Live allow me to search keywords in ONE message at a time. Gmail allows [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/09/02/two-simple-reasons-for-why-windows-live-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Department of Defense to teach migrating to open-source software</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/08/21/us-department-of-defense-to-teach-migrating-to-open-source-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/08/21/us-department-of-defense-to-teach-migrating-to-open-source-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written about the United States National Security Agency contributing to information security (with its release of the SHA cryptographic hash functions) and a set of modifications that can be applied to Unix-like operating systems, such as Linux and BSD. Now, the United States Defense Information Systems Agency (a division of the Department of Defense), has started [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/08/21/us-department-of-defense-to-teach-migrating-to-open-source-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>android and iPhone vulnerability compared</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/07/13/android-and-iphone-vulnerabilit-compared/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/07/13/android-and-iphone-vulnerabilit-compared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenneth Van Wyk wrote an article for itmanagement.earthweb.com in which he tried to assess the level of vulnerability of Google android and Apple Inc. iPhone OS. I’m going to go out on a limb here and predict Google’s Android mobile phone platform is going to prove itself to be more secure than Apple’s iPhone in the long run. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/07/13/android-and-iphone-vulnerabilit-compared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for protecting your privacy on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/25/tips-for-protecting-your-privacy-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/25/tips-for-protecting-your-privacy-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data irresponsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World posted a very useful article about tips on protecting your privacy on Facebook. Avoid Facebook Disasters Ignoring Facebook&#8217;s privacy options&#8211;some of them fairly new and not well known&#8211;can trip up the social-networking site&#8217;s users in a number of ways. Here are some that everyone who has a Facebook account should be aware of. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/25/tips-for-protecting-your-privacy-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First critical IE8 vulnerabilities given serious treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/11/first-critical-ie8-vulnerabilities-given-serious-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/11/first-critical-ie8-vulnerabilities-given-serious-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloatware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when it appeared Windows and its associated services were looking more stable month after month, Microsoft chose June to tackle a plethora of vulnerabilities including no fewer than 14 that its security engineers believe could be exploitable within the next 30 days. Read the article at Betanews.com]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/11/first-critical-ie8-vulnerabilities-given-serious-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All your personal files are safe with Ubuntu 9.04</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/11/all-your-personal-files-aresafe-with-ubunt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/11/all-your-personal-files-aresafe-with-ubunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data irresponsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/?p=1093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ubuntu already featured by default security enhancements developed by the U.S. National Security Agency, but version 9.04 of the Linux distribution now brings seamless file encryption for added protection of critical data. When activated, the option automatically mounts the encrypted home folder without asking for a password, and the user can browse and work with files at normal speed. Should the encrypted folder need to be recovered, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/06/11/all-your-personal-files-aresafe-with-ubunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cybercrimicals stealthier than ever</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/cybercrimicals-stealthier-than-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/cybercrimicals-stealthier-than-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 07:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybercriminality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/cybercrimicals-stealthier-than-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the scarier realities about malicious software is that these programs leave ultimate control over victim machines in the hands of the attacker, who could simply decide to order all of the infected machines to self-destruct. Most security experts will tell you that while this so-called &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; is an available feature in some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/cybercrimicals-stealthier-than-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>careful with SSL connections</title>
		<link>http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/careful-with-ssl-connections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/careful-with-ssl-connections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 07:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybercriminality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/careful-with-ssl-connections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A flaw in most browsers could allow crackers to trick the application in diplaying a connection as secure when in fact it is not. Websites that use an enhanced form of digital authentication remain just as vulnerable to a common form of spoofing attack as those that use less costly certificates, two researchers have found. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1sd.org/2009/05/10/careful-with-ssl-connections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

